This is an update email received regarding Bill 117, regarding the pending prorogue in the month of March 2010.

 The Legislature did not prorogue during the last recess. They are scheduled to prorogue on March 4 until March 8. I don't know what the status of Bill 117 will be after prorogation - depends if the Legislature passes a motion to carry the bill forward or not.

There Standing Committee on Justice Policy does not have any meetings planned in terms of review of Bill 117.


Susan

Susan Sourial
Committee Clerk/Greffière de comité
Standing Committee on Justice Policy/Comité permanent de la justice
Legislative Assembly of Ontario/Assemblée législative de l'Ontario

This is an email that we have received regarding the status of bill 117 and what will happen with it into the new year. Let's hope for a prorogue and be done with this thing!

RE: Status of Bill 117‏

From:	susan_sourial@ontla.ola.org
Sent:	December 10, 2009 8:22:32 AM
To:	essexcountyriders@hotmail.com

There has been no satus changes to Bill 117 as of :

November 6, 2009

 Click here to view Bill 117 and it's current status 

There has been no satus changes to Bill 117 as of :

September 9, 2009

 Click here to view Bill 117 and it's current status 

There has been no satus changes to Bill 117 as of June 8th, 2009

  Click here to view Bill 117 and it's current status 

There has been no satus changes to Bill 117 as of April 29th, 2009

There has been no satus changes to Bill 117 as of March 1, 2009

Good Read on Bill 117

Globe and Mail Article " No Kids on Bikes?" Jan. 15, 2009

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Report from IronMaiden (motorcycle advocate):

Bill 117 as you know, has been referred to the Justice Committee after passing 2nd reading on December 4th however it is not written in stone that it will get that far. The Ontario Legislature resumes on February 18, if it prorogues the house all Bills that aren't on their exemption list will be dead including those referred to the Justice Committee and that includes of course, Bill 117.

This will not however, keep MPP Helena Jaczek from presenting it again. I think it's important that we continue to put pressure on our MPPs. It may help too, to let MPP Jaczek know that we have the information below and perhaps we can persuade her to give it up.

What everyone needs to know is that the numbers she has been putting forward to beget fear and rally support for her cause are false. I also believe that she knows it and that is even more damning and infuriating to the motorcycle community.

I have finally been able to get in touch with a research associate from Smartrisk. You may recognize it as the organization where MPP Jaczek claims to have collected her "alarming statistics". Driven by her well meaning yet misguided desire to protect our children from injury she has spewed these figures again and again to any who will listen.

What I've discovered first of all is that 'motorcycle related injuries' in the Smartrisk data sheets includes mopeds, motor scooters and motorized bicycles. This explains to some extent, why Jaczek's numbers are so much higher than the statistics from the Ministry of Transportation's Annual Safety Reports on motorcycle injuries.

More importantly is that the data compiled by Smartrisk contains figures of motorcycle-related injuries to riders only. The document is in fact titled "Motorcycle Rider Hospitalizations". MPP Jaczek must have overlooked that small yet significant piece of information. She clearly stated to the Ontario Legislature that since the 2005 MTO figures of 21 children being injured as motorcycle passengers, Smartrisk has noted 556 emergency department visits of children 14 and under for the fiscal year 2005/06 and that these numbers seem to indicate that injuries are increasing.

The 46 child passengers hospitalized for serious "motorcycle-related" injuries claimed by MPP Jaczek were in fact not passengers at all, they were riders and they were riders of mopeds, scooters and motorized bicycles as well. MPP Jaczek has put forth a completely dishonest representation of Smartrisk's figures.

Since the law requires you to be 16 years of age to ride a "motorcycle-related" vehicle on the roadways of Ontario we can only conclude that the 46 hospitalizations and the 556 emergency department visits were children riding off the roadways of Ontario. Clearly not what MPP Jaczek implied to anyone.

Smartrisk suggested that I research into police reports for more details yet that would be redundant as that is where the Ministry of Transportation gets their figures for their Annual Safety Reports. They show an average of 17.5 children injured yearly on motorcycles on the roadways of Ontario. These figures include minimal, minor and major injuries, true government statistics we, in the motorcycling community can be very proud of. Especially considering there were more than 140,000 motorcycles on the roads in Ontario last year.

I have below a quote from a letter of support from the Association of Local Public Health Agencies, one of the organizations supporting Bill 117 and of which MPP Jaczek mentioned in her address to the Ontario Legislature.

"The statistics in your letter suggest that the incidence of motorcycle-related injuries to children is increasing significantly. From 1995 to 2005, an average of about 20 injuries per year was reported for this age group, whereas in 2005-2006 alone, there were 46 hospitalizations."

I read this as proof that MPP Jaczek is using her manipulated and misrepresented statistics to garner support for her cause. Even still, how could anyone believe that practically in the same year child injuries increased from 21 to 46 hospitalizations? Well we now know that this is a false statement altogether. Simply put, Jaczek did not have the numbers to garner support for her 'cause' because children are not being hurt on the back of motorcycles.

All in all it astounds me how she can embellish statistics so significantly without question or further investigation and gain support for a Bill that would essentially make it illegal for a certain percentage of the population to use a legal mode of transportation on the streets of Ontario. She has in truth, convinced many that the average injury to children has, in one year risen from 21 to 556 and has done so by manipulating, or shall I say down right misrepresenting Smartrisk figures.

In the fiscal year of 2002/03 Smartrisk did an actual report on motorcycle injuries alone which claims that 5% of 736 hospitalizations in that year were passengers of all age groups. This we can believe. How many of those 36 then, were children under the age of 14? According to that same report, 47% of what MPP Jaczek would interpret as "serious hospitalizations" include broken arms and legs.

In an interview on Show 55 at www.bikerradiomagazine.com MPP Jaczek admitted she does not fully understand, more specifically is "not clear" about what the numbers from Smartrisk represent.

Was she aware then that the figures she used were completely false or did she simply begin a campaign for Bill 117 before doing the proper research? Is it better for her to knowingly spread untrue facts or to be unsure and declare them anyway? Make up your own mind.

-IronMaiden 

This information was received today regarding the status of the House and of Bill 117, from the Committee Clerk for the Committee on Justice Policy.

Essex County Riders-Canada,  

The House is in recess until February 17th. The Standing Committee on Justice Policy has no authority to sit during this recess. When the House does resume, the Committee will be dealing with 2 Government bills.

No word yet on whether or not the Legislature will prorogue - or when.

Susan
Susan Sourial
Committee Clerk
Legislative Assembly of Ontario

Hello Everyone,

          Well over the past few weeks we have learned a lot about our Government and how things work in the house. So I would like to bring up to date on Bill 117.

           Bill 117 after its second reading has been sent to the Committee on Justice Policy with no date set for review. As of December 11, 2008 the house has adjourned for the Christmas Holiday and will not be back until February 17, 2009.

          Since this Bill has been sent to Committee there are a few things that can happen to it before or on the reconvene of the House in February.

•  If the House does not Prorogue, there is 2 major Government Bills currently on the floor with Committee and will have first priority in February. As of December 11, 2008 those Bills do not have a date of review, meaning Bill 117 will not see Committee Review until sometime in March, April or May of 2009.

           ****Information from Committee Clerk****

With the Bill in Committee Status how we fight it changes, the Local MPP’s have no influence on what happens with the Bill once it has been sent to Committee.

Here are the “Committee Submissions Guide Lines” for any letters you would like to send to the Committee, all letters must be sent to the Committee Clerk and will be forwarded to the Committee Members if and when Bill 117 has a date of review.

Content of Submissions

Briefs should deal specifically with the subject-matter which has been referred to the Committee. If in doubt, the Clerk of the Committee should be contacted.

To ensure that submissions to the Committee assist the members in obtaining a full understanding of the views put forward and the recommendations made, the following points should be considered when preparing briefs:

• factual information should be included which substantiates the conclusions put forward, the views expressed and the claims made;
• recommendations should be as specific as possible;
• the brief should be prefaced with a summary of the main conclusions and recommendations; and
• brevity (briefness) is recommended.

Sending Written Submissions

Those wishing to comment on a particular Bill may send written submissions to the appropriate Committee Clerk by fax, mail or email.   

 Committee Clerk

Susan Sourial
Tel. 416-325-7352    Fax:  416 325 3505

susan_sourial@ontla.ola.org

Address:

Committees Branch
99 Wellesley Street West
Room 1405, Whitney Block
Toronto, ON M7A 1A2

Petitions are still very important!  If you have not signed one yet, they are available for you at any of the following venues:

****Also if you would like to print a copy of the petition and acquire signatures here is the file below. No need to worry where to or when to send them, you can drop off full petitions sheets at any of the above venues and we will collect them and make sure that they are at the right place at the right time for you!

 Petition_Against_Bill_117.pdf

Mark Richardson-Wheels Editor:

http://www.wheels.ca/newsFeatures/article/460486

Allan Johnson-SPECIAL TO THE STAR :

 http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/article/485681